When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the technology develops, novel technological devices keep emerging on the market. While some people purchase them immediately after the products come out, others would like to wait until many abandoned them. From my standpoint, I prefer buying a new technological device once it is published.
As a technology geek, I always love to be the first to try out new devices that come out. They can provide me with the practical using experience of the latest technology. For such a geek like me, it is always etching to see others using the state-of-the-art devices and cannot try it on my own. Thus, even though most of the new devices are expensive, I tend to invest my money for them. For example, when the iPhone X came out, I originally chose not to buy one since they were so expensive at that time. But when I saw my friends using them to unlock the phone with their faces, I felt the function was so fascinating that I cannot suppress my desire to own one anymore. At that night, I spent the majority of money I had to purchase one. Although I had to cut my budgets in other areas for several months, I did think that the phone worth the price and I had a wonderful experience of using it.
Furthermore, I believe that technology should always be up-to-date, and thus, there is no meaning of using a deprecated device. While technology makes people's lives easier, it actually refers to the latest technology at the current time. Technology companies constantly upgrades their products to optimize them. For example, an iPhone 4 seemed to be a product of high technology back to ten years ago, it now looks pretty small and a lot of its functions need improvements. People do not use them today because they did not follow the trend of technological enhancement: for instance, they fail to support 5G and thus its internet speed is too slow for normal use today. As they cannot fulfill today's people's needs, they are deprecated and people would not use them.
In a nutshell, I prefer to buy a new tech device right away because I am a tech geek and I believe that technology should always be up-to-date.
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own word 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement University students should be required to take at least one course that teaches them the culture of a country rather than their own 80
- Brendan the Navigator was an Irish priest who lived in the 6th century He is most famous for embarking on a voyage in search of the mythical Island of the Blessed The details of Brendan s voyage recorded as stories in old manuscripts suggest to some that 76
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 80
- If your friend want to reduce living expenses what would you suggest Find a roommate to share the rent Refrain from purchasing new versions of smartphones Buy less expensive food and cooking at home 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, look, so, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6329787234 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72310815378 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523936170213 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6089876295 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220806415901 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720923468125 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387283945828 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150049998425 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410930832052 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, look, so, thus, while, as for, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6329787234 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72310815378 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523936170213 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6089876295 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220806415901 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720923468125 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387283945828 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150049998425 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410930832052 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.