"When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
When people talk about what makes a person successful, it is inevitable to mention both hard work and luck. While a lot of winners in life claim that they have achieved their accomplishment solely through hard work, others may include luck as part of their success. In my opinion, I incline to the view that luck does play an important role under certain circumstance.
First of all, nobody can deny that hard-working attitude and all-in commitment are the most critical determinants contributing to one’s success. As is known, even luck favors those who have been prepared well. That is to say, hard work is the premise of luck. For example, Yao Ming was really blessed to be born in a family with a basket tradition passing from generation to generation. However, without his own efforts made to reach excellence, he wouldn’t have been playing in NBA for so many years and proved himself as one of the most dominating players. Nowadays, there are many young basketball players who are just as talented as Yao, but lack his ambition and endeavor to become outstanding, they make a mistake by overestimating their innate ability rather than focusing on being diligent, thus failing everyone’s expectation.
However, luck does help people when something unexpected happens and benefits the hard worker. Given that such random probability gets rid of the obstacle getting in the way, it may become easier for people to succeed. Another famous athlete, Li Na, can be a good example of how luck may be in favor of a competitive person. What distinguishes Li Na from other Chinese tennis players is that she won two trophies in two of the four most important tennis tournaments in the world. Although Li’s own talent and effort should not be underestimated, in fact, she had never competed with the Williams sisters in the final matches because they were eliminated in the previous rounds of the tournaments. So, in a way, the fact the her biggest competitors lost their games could be seen as a huge boost in her course of winning the championship. Again, she still had to beat the rest of the top players before finally being awarded the title.
In short, I strongly believe that luck won’t be helpful at all if nothing has been done to make a person proficient and skilled. However, once an individual does whatever he or she could for success, there are chances that luck might give this person a head start.
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 89
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 76
- TPO 52 Integrated Writing Task Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the North Slope wa 80
- TPO 29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'her'?
Suggestion: the; her
...the tournaments. So, in a way, the fact the her biggest competitors lost their games co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, in short, first of all, in my opinion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86231884058 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71046460178 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8408354699 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151818198877 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051809409385 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473533117713 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935268411477 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282685180494 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.