When you learn a new language, you like to study at school in your country with your classmate. Or study abroad and interaction with native speaker
Learning a new skill has a tremendous impact on people's life, especially for students. Some individuals prefer to studying a new language by engaging with other native folks. From my vantage points, I believe that learning a language with a colleague has a positive influence on youngsters for the following reasons.
To begin with, learning a language with peers will improve humans' language fastly. For instance, when I was in high school, I had a buddy, Ali. We decided to learn English together. We spent a lot of time in watching movies, listening to music, following news channels. going to American concerts and using chat in the internet to speak with American people. We spent enjoyed time and had a lot of fun. On the other hand, if I go to school to study a language, I can not stay for long period at school. In other words, a long duration of studing is poring for young individuals. As a result, I enhance my Language by studying with my friend with a few months.
In addition, Studying new communication skills in university is too expensive. young people should pay much of fands for university and travel for a destination. For example, When students are traveling, they should pay for living and transportation. Also, most university tuition fees are pricy. Thus, the price of books is too high. While, if the student studys with his colleague, he will not pay for these commitments, especially most students today are living independently. They may work to pay for tuition fees or face money crises from these expenses. Consequently, studying with a peer will help students to save a lot of money and afford.
To wrap it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, learning speaks a new language with a friend is more beneficial than other alternatives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 60
- what do you thing better for students studying too many material to improve their grade or studying 3 4 subjects 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following idea and why the people always solve their problems by themself with the help of a family without the government s help 60
- do you thinks that good quality in education is a good point in university 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'study'?
Suggestion: study
...or students. Some individuals prefer to studying a new language by engaging with other n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Going
...ning to music, following news channels. going to American concerts and using chat in ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Young
... skills in university is too expensive. young people should pay much of fands for uni...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93708609272 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88539064004 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7822026022 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.380952381 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25615964248 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781945181764 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765338200337 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169713450223 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057852355398 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.