Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay, an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun?
Whether people should take an interesting yet difficult job with less vacation or a job with more vacation but less fun arouse a heated debate among job seekers. Although there are pros and cons for this statement, I personally prefer getting a career that is interesting but with less vacation. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, mental health is an essential factor for me when I am choosing my career. Therefore, I prefer to acquire a job that is interesting because it can enhance my mental health and make me happier. For instance, I am currently a white-hat hacker; I get paid for penetrating an organization’s infrastructure and hunting for vulnerabilities in servers. As a matter of fact, my job is exceptionally intriguing because I need to address unpredictable yet fascinating problems all the time, such as guessing the correct password patterns, finding vulnerabilities in server misconfiguration, etc. As a result, even thought I may need to arrive at my company during the summer vacation, I did not feel upset or stressed doing my tasks for once. On the other hand, I once joined an algorithm research laboratory at National Institute of Research. The researches conducted in the institution is comparably advanced and hardcore, and the average workload is quite heavy there. To be more specific, before paper submission deadline, I felt despondent every time I failed to complete my algorithm report. Therefore, despite the fact that my supervisor allowed me to take a break from July to September, I felt exceptionally exhausted during my work time, and this made me developed some mental health problems like melancholia.
Last but not least, I place an emphasis on efficiency on my work, and taking an exciting job with less vacation can undoubtedly improve my working efficiency. As an example, I once participated in a company called AIdea Technology as a machine learning engineer. My supervisor asked me to use the most state-of-the-art machine learning model to build a face-recognition machine. This newly-invented model is quite interesting because it required precise calculation on the curve of human’s facial expression change. Therefore, I become really attentive when researching this topic. In addition, my boss did not granted me to take a two week spring break, so I had no choice but to concentrated on my model-training mission during the break. Consequently, I finished constructing a face-recognition model with 90% accuracy in no more than a week. So according to my experience, having a fun job without any vacations increases my productivity.
In conclusion, I prefer getting a job that is interesting but with less vacations due to the aforementioned reasons. After all, I am really concerned about my mental health and working efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to engineer'
Suggestion: to engineer
... AIdea Technology as a machine learning engineer. My supervisor asked me to use the most...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... most state-of-the-art machine learning model to build a face-recognition machine. Th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'grant'
Suggestion: grant
...his topic. In addition, my boss did not granted me to take a two week spring break, so ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vacations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ting a job that is interesting but with less vacations due to the aforementioned rea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, really, so, therefore, after all, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20353982301 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36820134899 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544247787611 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1725115891 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.909090909 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13636363636 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29805535476 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934988222374 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138275701492 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264124682411 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156919583343 0.0645574589148 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.