Which is more important for a school? To buy new equipment or hire famous teachers.
Some people think that buying new equipment is more crucial for a school, while others claim that hiring well-known lecturers is more essential. For me, I believe that hiring famous teachers is more important. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, universities focus on reputation, and seeking high-quality professors helps them procure a good reputation. For example, my college once hired 25 researchers from National Taiwan Research Institution, which is the most prestigious research center in Taiwan. These researchers published uncountable papers and research results in famous journals like IEEE. Thus, after my university brought these intelligent educators into campus, my college became exceptionally reputable in the academic field. On the other hand, my brother's university spent more than fifty million dollars purchasing equipment for the nuclear laboratory, but most students feel repulsive about having nuclear research institutions inside their campus. So apparently, spending money on hiring high-quality educators helps a university gain a more favorable image.
In addition, universities are usually concerned about budgets, but spending money on various equipment might make them waste too much money. Take my friend's university as an example. My friend's college once spent 4000 million dollars updating equipment in the gym. To be more specific, the school replaced mechanical treadmills and weight-lifting equipment with intelligent and electrical ones. Nevertheless, most students prefer studying in dorms to exercising in the gym. That is, the gym is usually empty, so students complained that their school wasted too much money on things they didn't request for. On the contrary, my university only spent 4 million dollars recruiting famous lecturers. So evidently, hiring good teachers costs less than purchasing equipment.
Last but not least, schools must emphasize students' grade, and hiring well-known instructors help them acquire better grades. Take my cousin's school as an example. My cousin's middle school managed to find famous cram-school English teachers to tutor its students. The well-known and well-educated instructors use mnemonic phrases to aid students in better memorizing English vocabulary. As a result, most students' English scores enhanced dramatically. Contrarily, my niece's high school bought English textbooks and brochures for pupils to study. Yet, students cannot memorize them easily since no one guided them on how to learn new vocabulary efficiently. Eventually, her school's average English score did not improve.
In conclusion, I maintain that hiring famous teachers is more vital for school because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
- In modern society when interviewers interview candidates sometimes they use other sources to get information of the candidates Which of the following do you think is a better solution 1 Talk to the former boss of the candidate 2 Check the online profile o 73
- Imagine you have one week to spend on a vacation in a city you ve never been to before Would you prefer to spend the week participating in scheduled activities such as going on guided tours of the city or would you prefer to spend the week exploring the c 59
- In time of financial crisis which of the following group of people should be firstly supported by the government family with young children people who lost jobs recently retired people aged over 70 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Your job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than your social life does 80
- Some thinks that scores should be the sum of the scores of many assignments while others think that scores should be the results of 1 or 2 exams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ol wasted too much money on things they didnt request for. On the contrary, my univer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81453634085 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94379226552 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1010513017 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2307692308 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3461538462 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19230769231 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341664200143 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091429760022 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106904528355 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249890282083 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138209835835 0.0645574589148 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.