Friendship is one of the most precious treasures that each person can have. There are diversified opinions on the main factors that make a friendship perennial. Even though some people think friends sharing the same interests can cultivate a long-lasting friendship, other people associate eternal relationships between friends with mutual trust. There is a third group with whom I comply holding the idea that what cement the bond between friends is nothing but helping each other in predicaments. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that when friends support each other in every thin and thick, they build a friendship that can last for a lifetime. People do not forget those staying by their sides in their difficulties and help them to overcome those issues. By helping each other, friends show how they care about their friendship, which usually leads to mutual trust. According to one survey, more than half of the friendships incorporating this characteristic end up in a happy marriage. Therefore, this reason manifests that the most contributing factor in cultivating an eternal friendship is helping each other whenever necessary.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that people's interests usually change over time. If people choose their friends based on their interests, they can never build long-lasting friendships. Sharing the same interest is not an as decisive factor as being helpful. Drawing from my own experience, I love football and spend most of my free time playing football. However, I consider none of my teammates as my best friend, and I do not have permanent friendships with any of them in spite of sharing the same interests. I cherish my friendship with those people taking care of me and helping me in pickles, like my home mates. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that sharing the same interests is not a significant term for building a friendship lasting a lifetime.
To make the long story short, many people are in favor of the notion that mutual trust and having the same interests are prerequisites of perpetual friendship. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that not only is helping each other strengthen people's relationship with their friends eternally, but it also brings about mutual trust in their friendship.
- Amtrak is an intercity train service currently owned by the United States government There are a number of critics who believe that the government should not own Amtrak and that Amtrak should be sold to a privately owned company These critics put forward 73
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w 73
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, third, thus, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20537897311 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88801806956 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528117359413 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.911527976 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.052631579 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221413896112 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769489748502 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550618650144 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152663545037 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00926738969535 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.