Which one is the most important for a teacher of high school:
1 The ability to help students plan for their future;
2 The ability to find the students who need help most and help them;
3 Teach students how to learn outside the classroom.
Teachers whether they want or don't want play an earthshaking role in students' lives. Quite a bit of students just follow suit their teachers and do whatever he or she does. In this regard, some people think that a teacher's ability to help students plan for their future is of great importance. Some others agree with the idea that a teacher should have the ability to find the students who need help most and help them. The others believe that neither help to plan nor find week students is important than teaching them how to learn outside the classroom. I, personally, fully subscribe the third notion because of manifold reasons. Two of the paramount ones are nurturing self-independent students and aiming to prevent injustice for those students who are not week.
First and foremost, it's better for a society to nurture brainy students for the sake of progression in society. In fact, when students are taught how to plan their future, they unconsciously are taught to follow the ways which are predefined to everyone and not probably the way which belongs to them. In contrast, if teachers teach students how to learn outside, students not only will be nurtured self-independent in their studies, but most of them might also find their own way to the future success. Because trying to find their way in order to learn lessons, they little by little comprehend what abilities they have, so by continuing this process, they can be capable to identify their own way. Besides, being literate is the prerequisite of one's success—which needs a plan for. If students don’t learn the lessons, how their future planning will help them? In the other words, when someone has problem with mathematics, how he or she could be a chemist, astronomer, or related professions? Furthermore, an illiterate person cannot be self-independent, so others seem to use him or her to gain their goals.
Moreover, without any shadow of doubt, teachers' impacts on students' lives are undeniable. Meanwhile, aim to prevent of injustice for those students who are not week is the key and paramount problem. Although teachers' ability to find the students who need help most and help them is so pleasant, in my viewpoint it is like a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it has a positive effect on students who have problems and makes them improve their knowledge as well as increase their spirits. On the other hand, for those who are not week might have a negative effect. These students might think that they don't have their teacher's interest, so they tend to lose their motivation as well as become jealous in some cases. With
this in mind, if teachers teach students how to learn outside the classroom, this will not violate anybody's right.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I believe that it is better for students to be taught how to learn outside the classroom rather than being taught how to plan for their future because of learning the ability of being self-independent. In addition, I do believe that teaching how to learn outside outweigh helping week students in order to prevent injustice.
- Your friend has the opportunity to study in either one of two majors (fields of study). Which one of the following two types of majors do you think is a better choice and why? a) A major that would allow your friend to complete his or her studies and get 73
- summarize 3
- When students study these days, many of them also do other things at the same time, for example, use their phones, spend time on the Internet or listen to music.Do you agree or disagree that such activities have a bad effect on learning? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary. 73
- Which one is the most important for a teacher of high school 1 The ability to help students plan for their future 2 The ability to find the students who need help most and help them 3 Teach students how to learn outside the classroom 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
Teachers whether they want or dont want play an earthshaking role in stude...
^^^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...n this regard, some people think that a teachers ability to help students plan for their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
..., being literate is the prerequisite of ones success—which needs a plan for. If stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t. These students might think that they dont have their teachers interest, so they t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll as become jealous in some cases. With this in mind, if teachers teach students...
^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., this will not violate anybodys right. To sum up, with all taken into account, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, third, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as well as, in my view, in some cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2578.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90114068441 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71865776796 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446768060837 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3838281528 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586272710423 0.236089414692 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184852626115 0.076458572812 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121658792982 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363531704505 0.150856017488 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11877779645 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.