No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects about the ton of information available to people on the Internet today. If I were forced to choose, I definitely think that the large amount of information available online has benfited people around the world. I firmly believe in the positive effects of the easy availability of information on the Internet due to several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start, people, nowadays, are well informed about various topics and important events taking place on a global level. People now have access to news and announcements at their fingertips due to widespread use of smart phones, which are capable of obtaining information from the Internet without any hassles. Moreover, communication of crucial time sensitive information has helped in saving a number of lives. I have to admit that my opinion is highly influenced by my own personal experiences. For example, my uncle, who lives in Tokyo, Japan, encountered an earthquake five years ago. The information of the earthquake was quickly and effectively communicated to the people living there through social media and other channels on the Internet. Thus, this crucial information was available to the people at the right time and hence, helped in evacuating the city before the earthquake hit. Therefore, my uncle and his family did not lose their lives due to the availability of information on the Internet. If Internet was not present during the time of the earthquake, many families would have lost their lives.
Secondly, the easy access of information online has also helped in preventing cheating and duping people's money. Since, people are aware of the prices of various products online, it is now difficult for merchants and sellers to price an item beyond its actual worth. It has helped people in making informed choices on various important decisions. Drawing from my own personal experience, I was booking a flight ticket to Dubai via my travel agent two years back. The travel agent quoted a price for the ticket and I became suspicious since he quoted a very high price, stating the reason that it was peak time to visit Dubai during the month of January. Dubious of his claims, I checked the flight prices online and realized that he was demanding double the actual price. Thus, I rejected his offer and decided to book the tickets online which worked out better for us, and also ended up saving a good amount of money. If I did not have access to the flight prices on the Internet, I would have been swindled by my travel agent on that occasion and possibly, many more times.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I certainly believe that the large amount of information available on the Internet is beneficial to the public since, people are more aware of the events taking place around the world and take more informed decisions.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 49
- TPO 40. Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The use of fluoride in preventative dentistry has been a great breakthrough in improving the dental health of large populations. Small amounts of soluble fluoride ions are present in all water sources, including oceans and also to some extent in food and 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94908350305 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65236773623 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476578411405 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5183482647 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261384667737 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840797339886 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664934544483 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177989151657 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672886484432 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.