There is no doubt that working is an inevitable part of every one’s life, and no one could deny this fact. A vast majority of people are of the opinion that the more various your tasks are, the more powerful they seem. I, contrary to popular belief, contend that it is more of benefit for people to doing similar tasks all day long. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons and examples to explicit my vantage point.
One of the reasons coming to my mind at first is that in this way, people can save more mental and physical energy as a result of doing the same activities. A study was conducted by a group of psychology researchers at Oxford University of technology. They start their experiments on two groups of employees. First, the workers having similar tasks all the day, and second, the workers that having different kinds of tasks. Its result indicated that the latter group who are accustomed to their works, do their duties 70 percent more thorough and precise than the former group.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that you are less stressed when you have less diverse type of tasks. To shed light on this issue, take a boss as an example. The boss leading a company, should have look of every section of this company such as engineering part, exporting and importing part, etc. This boss have the multitude tasks needed not only a great amount of time for adjusting this sections but it also need concentration and focus. As we can see, those occupations that
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to conclusion that in today's hectic life it is more fruitful for everybody to have a job with less various tasks. However, that was a story in nutshell. Actually, there are more reasons and examples elaborating on this idea which are not mentioned above due to the shortage of time. Finally, it is suggested that people having multiple tasks, more prone to mental diseases. To preventing this negative issue, we should consider more vacation time for them.
- TPO-50Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the 3
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 83
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is be 85
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 457, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
...for adjusting this sections but it also need concentration and focus. As we can see,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76859504132 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54743343111 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9553333916 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275131157308 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775104948305 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796776314665 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156790590782 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634710396273 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.