In this progressive and sophisticated world, where we live in, human beings have been engaged in many tasks in order to provide their necessities of their lives, and fulfill their inner satisfaction. Some people believe, it is more enjoyable to have a wide range of tasks to do in workdays. While, others have an opposite point of view. In my vantage point it would be more satisfied to have diverse activities and errands during our work time instead of doing same tasks every day. In what follows, i will elaborate on my vantage point.
First it is significant to be mentioned that, having many different tasks in our vocation, do not make us boring and tired, so it would be beneficial. Job satisfaction has a direct relationship with job efficiency. It means, if we enjoy our work hours we will perform our tasks in an appropriate manner, and with a wide variety of errands it would be possible.the results of a research conducted in my country, which conducted on employees of a private company, underscore the fact that, the staff prefer to have many different tasks to do in a day since doing same errands every day makes them tired. Thus, their efficiency will reduce.
Another reason, which deserves some attention here is that, workers can broaden their creativity and enhance their capabilities by doing different errands and activities during the workday. In contrast, doing the similar task every day, their ability remains confined to regular errands performing everyday. Doing different types of tasks give the workers a sense of creativity, since they try to perform their tasks in diverse ways, and the workers should come up with novel notions in order to perform thier new tasks in better way.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely reach the conclusion that, workers are more satisfied when they have different and new tasks to do than when they do similar tasks. Since, this action not only cause more efficiency but also can enhance workers abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... wide range of tasks to do in workdays. While, others have an opposite point of view....
^^^^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... same tasks every day. In what follows, i will elaborate on my vantage point. Fi...
^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ignificant to be mentioned that, having many different tasks in our vocation, do not make us b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate manner" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ur work hours we will perform our tasks in an appropriate manner, and with a wide variety of errands it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...the fact that, the staff prefer to have many different tasks to do in a day since doing same e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... confined to regular errands performing everyday. Doing different types of tasks give th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9255952381 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61392728645 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4746271795 48.9658058833 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393119038674 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128713587385 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114783485407 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25686474738 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819604801604 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.