In recent decades, it has become a challenge for companies to increase their retention rate of employees, which means to keep their employees staying with the company for a long time so they can reduce the time and effort spent on training new ones. I am of the opinion that workers' decision to stay depends much on their satisfaction, which can be improved by the variety of tasks they are required to do at work.
First of all, having to keep doing the same set of tasks every workday can have a significant impact on workers' motivation to get to work. One obvious effect is that they can easily get bored during their working hours. Some cope with this boredom by distracting themselves to scroll through social media or have some chit-chat when they are supposed to focus on the job. As the result, not only do those same types of tasks remain tedious and monotonous, they are also not getting done with full attention from unmotivated workers. This will only make the matter worse, creating a loop of dissatisfaction at work. Therefore, employees, especially the young ones, are most likely to stay enthusiastic and content with their job when it does not repeat from day to day.
What’s more, handling different types of tasks beyond the daily similar can actually bring employees more job satisfaction and contentment than they ever expect. Not any hired person comes into a job position knowing everything. If such workers are assigned some new duties each day at work, learning and gaining diverse experience on the job will become a matter of time. For instance, if accounting staff is asked to cooperate with other departments to increase company’s sales, they may end up learning from marketing and human resource team too. By facing such challenges in their job, workers are able to strengthen their corporate skills and obtain more knowledge about the industry, which constitute the continuous success in their career path. Eventually, it will become difficult to not feel satisfied and proud of how far they have come in their professional journey.
In conclusion, job satisfaction plays a crucial role in workers’ productivity and success at work. In order to achieve it, ever-changing workdays tend to offer better conditions for development than daily repeating loads of work.
- TPO 60 52
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 88
- TPO 51 integrated 90
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Salinity in Salton Sea 80
- TPO 07 Integrated Writing TaskIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...orkday can have a significant impact on workers motivation to get to work. One obvious ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.015625 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70700588462 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5698296574 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255106166989 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807405938107 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659686855425 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139735544627 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704759474344 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.