Workers from all walks of life have to deal with massive loads of work every day. Some managers prefer to assign similar tasks to a single worker, in that working on the same project may turn out to be more efficient and productive. From my perspective, however, it is bound to bring about dissatisfaction among workers if they have to do the same job day after day.
As is known to all, similar tasks tend to give rise to boredom, which can be the trigger for efficiency decline and discontent among employees. For example, if I were assigned similar problem sets every week, I would soon get bored of doing the homework and eventually hand in solutions of much lower quality. In reality, however, the teacher often assigns to me problem sets on different topics, which I have to learn various things to work out. It goes without saying that, unlike monotonous work, various tasks can arouse people's interest for sure and keep them inspired and engaged in acquiring new skills and knowledge. It is the variety of tasks that can be a wonderful driving force for workers to keep focused on handling multitudinous assignments and improving themselves.
More importantly, dealing with different types of tasks can be a perfect chance for workers to demonstrate their competence and find the field they are truly good at. Some employees may find it hard to handle some particular work even if they keep doing it again and again, but they may excel in another field easily. For example, I once worked at a company as an intern. I was first required to do mathematical analysis and theoretical reasoning which was beyond my abilities. When the manager found out my weakness and asked me to solve the problems through writing programs at the same time, I happened to find out that I was extremely dexterous at such jobs, which earned praise from my manager. This shows exactly the benefit of carrying out multiple types of tasks at the same time.
Considering the benefits, it is definitely reasonable to assign various types of work to employees. Only in this way can workers keep motivated and interested in their jobs and discover the fields they are really good at.
- TPO 41 Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such har 80
- TOEFL T P O 41 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 94
- High school students now cheat more than before in homework assignments by asking other students for answers Which of the following do you think is the most effective way to stop this phenomenon 1 Asking parents to monitor signing homework to prove no che 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...oblem sets every week, I would soon get bored of doing the homework and eventually hand ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80748663102 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60559542388 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553475935829 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4706683908 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236333803817 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781800248282 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455236083185 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146882489309 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496973973851 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.