Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are various jobs each of which involves workers with different tasks. Generally workers are more satisfied when they do different works during the job than when just do similar tasks all the day long because not only does it make them a less boring job, but also it increases their experiences and talents in different fields.
The first reason that can be stated here is that doing different tasks during the workday is some kind of variety for workers. Do various activities, workers become less boring, while if they do all days a repetitive work, they will be exhausted and bored, so when workers do various activities, they will be more satisfied.
The second point that deserves some words here is that when employees do different tasks on the job, they can enhance their ability and experiences. Consider a worker that do a specific work every day. There is nothing new for him, but if try various activities in his job, he can get more experiences in different fields related to his job. Getting more experts in the job would definitely satisfy workers because they found their time more useful.
To summarize, workers prefer to have various activities in their workplace. It makes a less boring job for them, and it will help them to increase their abilities and experiences in more fields. Who do you think to prefer to do one task in his job?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 52.1666666667 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78481012658 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43668602835 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4524603471 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409953902372 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164717948312 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114493597831 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276763250865 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981359704344 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.