You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for?
Use reasons and examples to support your position.
In the course of history, a plethora of people have be voted for getting different positions, some of which were as important as a king and some have been less significant. Among a wide variety of qualities regarded for an appropriate leader, honesty is one of the most prevalent ones. It is a controversial issue surrounding whether honesty is the most deciding factor based on which individuals can select their leader. Personally, I, to a great extent, hole the opinion that if I want to vote for a leader, either for student organization of for a club, I would not consider honesty the essential one. The most outstanding reasons are substantiated in the following paragraphs in detail.
To commence with, it is a cumbersome task to distinguish who is brutally honest, especially in the society in which a myriads of people lie in order to reach their goal. In facts, pretending to be honest, individuals going to grasp a position. For this reason, it may be truly perplexing and time-consuming to notice who is a honest, royal person. To shed more light on this issue, consider students going to vote for a leader for an organization in university; they know possible candidate for less than four years, and more precisely they are familiar with candidates two years in average. Therefore, a lot of students, especially freshmen, are not able to determine who is loyal and faithful the most, on the grounds that they merely have some limited information about other ones. Consequently, they cannot consider just honesty the most determining factor to vote for somebody in an election. Hence, human beings should not regard honesty as the main parameter in evaluating one's personality.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that there are many other factor that human beings should not turn a blind eye to them, including knowledge, experience, talent, and so forth. Therefore, people should assess one's quality based on various traits playing pivotal role is being a competent leader. For a tangible example, consider a person who is frank, and students are sure about this fact. Selecting him as their leader, he remains honest as well. But he is lack of valuable experience which is necessary for a team leader to guide the group. Therefore, after some time the members will face difficulties. For instance, he cannot allocated enough budget for the most considerable matters due to the fact he is not knowledgeable and experienced.
To some up, considering aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that a person should not just focus on honesty for choosing a leader or manager. Not only is honesty arduous to be validate and testified, but there are also several parameters which are as crucial as loyalty. Overall, it is highly recommended to consider different aspects and characteristics in order to opt the best leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-27 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | pounez | 60 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | zabanfinish | 60 | view |
| 2017-12-18 | Masoud3042 | 87 | view |
| 2017-10-12 | meysamkh | 95 | view |
- Some people say that students should study many lessons during a semester, while others think that it is better for students to just take 3 or 4 lessons. Which do you think is better. 73
- whether parents today are more involved in children’s education than were they in the past 76
- Archaeologists problem to study artifacts 3
- TPO29-independent 3
- Some people believe that the media for example television radio newspapers or Internet news sources are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past These people argue that the media today often present incorrect infor 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e of history, a plethora of people have be voted for getting different positions, ...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
...est, especially in the society in which a myriads of people lie in order to reach their g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing and time-consuming to notice who is a honest, royal person. To shed more ligh...
^
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...sty as the main parameter in evaluating ones personality. The second exquisite p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
... mentioned is that there are many other factor that human beings should not turn a bli...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... forth. Therefore, people should assess ones quality based on various traits playing...
^^^^
Line 5, column 759, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is not knowledgeable and experienced. To some up, considering aforementioned a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended considering'.
Suggestion: recommended considering
...ucial as loyalty. Overall, it is highly recommended to consider different aspects and characteristics i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2390.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94546856061 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3393207182 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.636363636 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29121957117 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857321259533 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709499004895 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18998265906 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068005925628 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.