You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for? Use reasons and examples to support your position.
In the democratic societies like the government and maybe a school, the election is the most important thing that the societies are based on it. People elect a person as an agent and the agent should govern the current activities and preserve the people right. A controversial question which often raised regarding this issue is that candidates should be honest or not. I firmly believe that they should be honest. In what follows, I will pinpoint my outstanding reasons.
First of all, honesty is the most important thing in the management methodology. If people tell lies and don’t do their promises, people’s confidence in the management and leadership will be receded. The election systems are based on trust and it is not such a big deal what the election is for. If the trust and confidence will be disappeared, people will not participate in the other elections and it has bad consequences on the given society. For example, for selection a mayor for my school, when I was a student, the candidate said that “I will build a football yard for the school”. We thought that he was honest, but he was a cheater and just the election was important for him. After that, all the students were skeptical toward the election, and the mayor and election were removed.
Furthermore, Honesty is the most important for leaders in the modern era. Many years ago, I read a book about organizational behavior theory. It was written by the professor who was engaged in Bentley University and it was based on the writer’s personal experience. As I remember, he proved that with honest relationships between employees and the leader, the performance in the organization would be higher. He argued that based on social exchange theory, if a leader behaves honestly, the employees will behave honestly. By this way, the loyalty in the organization will be high and subsequently performance will be influenced by that and will soar.
Briefly, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that not only honesty is important for survival in the democratic society, but also it improves the performance. So, I highly recommend that leaders should be honest to attract people and improve the given society performance.
- TPO 47 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting the museums is the best way to learn about a country 86
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for? Use reasons and examples to support your position. 70
- TPO 49 3
- People nowadays are more willing to help other people giving food or clothes than in the past 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, honestly, if, may, regarding, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04312668464 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98054224216 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512129380054 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8631067683 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.55 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185631933886 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590247071166 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687658195665 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109423103064 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495792081117 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.