You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for .Use reasons and examples to support your position.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that leaders have played an important role in the future of people and their life in different societies. Their decisions have the predominant impact on the members and their future. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that honest leaders are compulsory for groups who pave their way toward success. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, increasing the penchant of members and establishing closer relationships could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the perspective of members of a group toward the leader based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that members consider the behavior of the leaders and imitate them; thus, his/her characteristics obtain the group’s properties. Furthermore, these characteristics have impacts on the interaction among members, and members have better performance in a clear setting. To sum, it enhances members’ stimulation for working hard to pave the way for the triumph. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students unveiled the fact that in Apple company, workers work more efficient because their managers are honest with them and discuss with workers about their performance without any discrimination and very clear respectfully. It improved their performance and the company’s overall yield.
In addition to the reason raised above; the importance of honesty in clearing relationships could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, the honest leader talks with the members of the group easily and says the truth about everything. This ability decreases some doubts between members about the work’s facets. To elucidate on, the workers’ trust enhanced and it improved the relationship among people in the team. For instance, my manager in oil company, criticized my performance without any specific consideration while he was one of my best friends and it made me happy because I could find my faults and tried to correct them
Drawing upon the reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that honesty is one of the most highlighted features of a leader in groups. It not only increases the members’ incentive but also improves their friendships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | dalo | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-23 | zabanfinish | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree Rather than help children with their schoolwork parents should encourage their children do their work independently 64
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people i 73
- In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce their spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens. 73
- At one high school, more of the students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments. For example, many of students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignment. The school is considering making a chan 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpacts on the interaction among members, and members have better performance in a...
^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve but also improves their friendships.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34953703704 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1127219361 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55787037037 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.38498346 48.9658058833 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.941176471 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4117647059 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129913560241 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414488134298 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334490914993 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845721050165 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00877094857454 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.