You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you choose? Why?
-- A professor who proves to be very popular in students’ evaluations
-- A professor who was recently given an award for outstanding research.
Going to university is the most beneficial way to succeed in the future. In order to do that students require necessary preparation to graduate with the highest score. Among these plans, education plays a key role to reach the goal. To gain efficient knowledge beside practical skills, many people choose to study with the professor who award outstanding research on their major while the others think opposite. Personally speaking, I prefer to learn the course taught by the famous professors in students’ evaluations. To support my stance, following explanation will elaborate on my perspective.
To begin with, the popular professor based on evaluation of students possesses many other aspects beside advanced knowledge. He could be a person who has a perfect teaching skill, an intelligent way to simplify complicated problem or always catch attention of students by funny jokes. Also, students would love to work with him because he often present positive feedbacks which generate motivation for students. As a result, it accumulates over time and creates his popularity alongside the professional expertise.
Moreover, the popular professor is willing to support students when they stuck in difficult situation. In some cases, it contributes profound knowledge and experiences which could not be acquired from any official material. My sister experience can demonstrate this point. She who is as undergraduate student at Brown University got an opportunity to work with professors from Psychology department. She had a project about how to explain people’s behavior when they face hard situations. At the beginning, she didn’t figure out how to make up the survey to testify this problem. However, when she encountered with her professors, he pointed out a variety of approach to help her. Finally, she impressed the class with incredible solution.
To wrap it up, choosing a right professor to teach is really important to build solid background in students’ major so students should consider the teacher having their own popularity among students. They could have many great characteristics aside advanced expertise and are willing to support their disciple when they need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-02 | persepolistmm | 70 | view |
- If one of your friends has the opportunity to study in either one of two majors, which one of the following majors you will recommend: 1)A major that would allow your friend to complete studies and get a degree faster (so that he or she can get a ful 76
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 76
- A lot of high school students now cheat in homework assignments, by asking other students for answers. Which of the following do you think is the most efficient way to stop? 1)asking parents to help stop the students from cheating 2)penalty or p 76
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you ch 76
- When you decide to find a place to travel and want to compare two places which way do you think help you make a better decision read information online discussing with a friend who has been to those places Nowadays by explosion of technology we can surf o 43
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, really, so, while, as a result, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48529411765 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03927435111 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652941176471 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1254180305 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109003409681 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030991630538 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263891142084 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671370571641 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101039745024 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.