Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Nowadays youths and their impacts on the nations have gotten lucid for everyone who can pick a major choice like governors and managers. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question asking whether the new generation does not have enough effects on considerable decisions. I am afraid, I disagree with the opinion which is expressing the lack of ability to choose a variety of routes for young persons.
First of all, one of the most significant parts of countries is the university which is filled with a lot of students who are between 18 to 27 years old and lots of places to gather people for speaking about their preferences. To put on the other hand, an individual has an opportunity to participate in these kinds of sessions and having a role in his future. Under such a circumstance, students can listen to each other and after all, send their decision to the persons who are powerful and governing the country. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home, I had been leading the scientific community in my university for several years until I finished my university. Once upon a time while we were preparing a new newspaper of university, we found the government was going to change the boss of the university, we were not in favor of the decision; therefore, we write a paper about the event which was going to happen. As a result, the government had alternated their choice because they were aware of students' attitude.
Second, politicians notice that not considering young people in the passing laws, has negative effects on whole lands. To be specific, young persons are going to manage the state in university and not having experience in this job is harmful to the county in the tomorrow. It is crystal clear, a person who has no lessons about facing problems is not proper for controlling the country in the future. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my brother who has worked in a company which building houses for four years. He had promoted in his career, however, he was young, because he saw a lot of difficulties in the company during the project. The boss of the company thinks they need young people who have enough experience in a hard situation. If the boss had not permitted young people to involve in decisions, my brother would not promote in his job.
By and large, I do believe youths have strong impacts on their prospect. Since they have universities that help them to tell their comments also directors and supervisors who let them gain skills for tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mohammad9090 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 95
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 72
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, after all, speaking about, as a result, by and large, first of all, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74545454545 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71516155555 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520454545455 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5391010204 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129093640648 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456670494181 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413658933944 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777310298549 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488394060439 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.