Your university is planning to allow students to watch TV in their dormitories. What is your opinion and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages of watching TV in dormitories? Include reasons and examples to support your response.
Universities are always trying to make dormitories such a convenient place where students can get relaxed and feel like they are at their homes so television is one of the pieces of equipment that makes difference. While TV has numerous benefits, it has noticeable negative effects as well. Opinions are divided on whether students should be permitted to watch TV in dormitories or not. Personally, I am of the opinion that students should not be allowed to watch TV in dormitories in spite of it beneficial. I will develop my point of view by discussing the positive and negative aspects of TV in the following essay.
In the first place, it is undeniable that televisions are such great cheap entertainment that can play a crucial role in relieving students' minds after a tense day of studying by programs such as shows, movies, games, and so on. As a matter of fact, just studying could be overwhelming thereby watching funny shows which are capable of making anybody laughing can change his/her mood positively. Being a student, for example, I always try to change my mood after a tough day at university via watching talk shows like Ellen show. It really works and makes me happier and comes over on difficulties. As a result, in this case, allowing students to watch TV is exceedingly helpful.
On the other hand, it is a solid fact that everything has its own detrimental aspects and televisions are not exceptional. To be more specific, televisions are potentially destructive devices that could be a serious hinder in the process of practicing lessons at dormitories. My friend is a great clarifying example of this. My friend who is a big fan of football spends so much of his time at the dorm watching football games that most of the time he could not do his assignments perfectly. As a consequence, Last semester he barely passed his final exams since he had addicted to watching TV. Had he watched less TV, he could have passed the final exams easily.
To make a long story short, I strongly support the idea that students should not be permitted to watch TV at dorms since its disadvantages overweigh on its advantages. It is might be entertainment to help students come over difficulties but it is such a time-consuming distracting device that prevents students from concentrating on their lessons.
- The opinions of celebrities are more important to young people than they are to older people Do you agree or disagree 90
- The Northern Pacific sea star which is native to the coasts of Japan Korea and China has recently appeared thousands of kilometers away Because this sea star now threatens to harm marine ecosystems in new and distant areas scientists are currently investi 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement teachers in the past were more appreciated and valued by people than they were nowadays 71
- Scientists have long believed that bees existed up to some 200 million years ago This notion has recently come under some speculation because of a lack of any significant evidence to support this theory Key missing evidence includes fossil records the lac 90
- During the day most plants position their leaves so the leaves can collect sunlight However at night some plants fold their leaves There is no general agreement about why this occurs but there are several competing theories as to why it might be beneficia 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, so, well, while, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in spite of, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85606060606 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96713088302 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542929292929 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5108776941 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223602302092 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814357768106 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787343678794 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145857455048 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694181506993 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.