The lecture disagrees with the reading that presents the three possible ways to preserve an endangered tree, Torreya taxifolin by identifying three problems of these solutions.
First, the lecture refutes the first solution the reading suggests by emphasizing the effect of climate change. The reading mentions that Torreya tree could be preserved in the original place where they used to have thrived for thousands of years, referred to there as a specific microclimate in Florida. However, the lecture argues that climate change has led the areas to become drier and warmer compared to the time when they used to have thrived. Therefore, most of the places in the original Florida microclimate are not suitable for planning Torreya trees.
Second, the lecture assumes that the second possible solution suggested by the reading, relocating Torreya to other areas, can harm other native species of the areas by showing actual proof. She introduced humans’ helped migration of the black locust trees caused detrimental impacts on other native plants and trees including endangered species. Referring to the past mistake, she concerns that planning Torreya trees would cause unexpected issues like the relocation of the black locust trees.
Third, the lecture disbelieves that the research centers have enough capacity to preserve Torreya trees by expounding on the criteria for the trees to survive. While the reading suggests keeping the Torreya tree in the research centers would be favorable for the trees and researchers, the lecture illustrates that the trees cannot resist diseases in the research centers. She clarifies that the population of the tree needs to be large and genetically diverse to prevent diseases from spreading, and the environment of the research centers would not satisfy these criteria. Therefore, the lecture believes that the Torreya trees cannot be survived in the research centers in the long-term.
In conclusion, the lecture challenges the three possible solutions that the reading presents to preserve Torreya by identifying the effect of climate change and the potential risks of the migration of Torreya trees.
- TPO 12 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement television advertisement directed toward young children should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the statements Children should not be allowed to play the video games 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internetaccess while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping intouch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e relocation of the black locust trees. Third, the lecture disbelieves that the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 693, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the research centers in the long-term. In conclusion, the lecture challenges th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks of the migration of Torreya trees.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47005988024 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63183870967 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467065868263 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.721142199 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.538461538 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144417459231 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630142451603 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312048301205 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845260835275 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132943652747 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.