The passage and the lecturer are discussing about ways to preserve Torreya taxifolia trees of Florida state. While the passage mentions some ways to do reduce the decline of Torreya. The lecturer refutes all the ways mentioned in the passage by using his own reasons and evidences.
To start with, the reading passage suggests reestablishing Torreya in the same micro climate location of Florida where it thrived for many years. The lecturer on the other hand, argues that this method is unlikely to be successful. He says that these micro climate areas are affected by climate of surrounding regions of Florida, and also due to global warming the temperature has raised in this micro climate areas which resulted in drying up of wetter land, which is a necessity for growth of Torreya.
Secondly, the passage points out the option to move torreya to a different location where the temperature is cooler and suitable for its survival. However the lecturer argues that this kind of migration will lead to other consequences. He gives an example of black locust tree migration to support his point. The black locust tree has quickly spread and killed other plantations of the migrated region upon it's migration.
Finally, the last point option mentioned in the passage is to preserve the Torreya in research centers in a closely monitored environment. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this method pointing out that This preserved population trees will not be resistant to diseases and also the research centers will not have enough capacity to grow the trees in large population and in a diverse way for the Torreya to be resistant to diseases.
In conclusion, The reading passage mentions the ways of preserving the Torreya trees. The lecturer refutes these methods by stating that they will be unsuccessful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rreya taxifolia trees of Florida state. While the passage mentions some ways to do re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different location where the temperature is cooler and suitable for its survival....
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s cooler and suitable for its survival. However the lecturer argues that this kind of m...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a diverse way" with adverb for "diverse"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... grow the trees in large population and in a diverse way for the Torreya to be resistant to dise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resistant to diseases. In conclusion, The reading passage mentions the ways of...
^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stating that they will be unsuccessful.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14141414141 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67930125952 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488215488215 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7630927179 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153475105466 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615683552912 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485748541707 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937269646025 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220925973486 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.