Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree
The passage offers three different proposals for scientists to protect Torreya taxifolia from going extinct. However, the lecturer claims that none of the three solutions is effective in reestablishing this endangered tree species.
First, the passage proposes to reestablish Torreya in its original habitat, where its population was steady. This particular region in the north of Florida has a microclimate which differs from that of the region surrounding it. The wet and cool microclimate enabled Torreya to flourish. However, the lecturer points out that the microclimate in this region has experienced a change and can no longer provide Torreya with the coolest and dampest climate ideal for its growth. Two main factors contribute to this change: the global warming, which makes the area less cool than in the past and the wetland drained, which makes the area dryer than before.
Second, the passage comes up with the proposal that the tree can be moved to another remote region where Torreya might have thrived long time ago. Some scientists believe that by doing so, they are helping Torreya to settle back in an area with more suitable living conditions. But according to the lecturer, by citing the example of another tree called the black locus tree, reestablishing a tree species in another region can threaten the existence of other species and provoke the extinction of other species. Indeed, Torreya may thrive and its population may spread quickly, but other trees, especially those that are also endangered, may suffer because of this new invader. Thus, the outcome would be unpredictable.
Third, the passage suggests that Torreya can be preserved in research centres, where the seeds and saplings can be kept carefully. Torreya trees are better protected to ensure their survival. However, the lecturer refutes this idea by stating that keeping Torreya in human-monitored centers can eventually make these trees unable to resist diseases, since in order to resist disease, two conditions must be met: the tree must be in a large population, and the tree must be genetically diverse. The research centres can not meet either condition, which may gradually result in the trees' incapability of survival in the long term.
- Working 4 days a weekIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies 80
- Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing this endangered tree species. First, the passage proposes to reestabli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... makes the area dryer than before. Second, the passage comes up with the pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come would be unpredictable. Third, the passage suggests that Torreya...
^^
Line 13, column 583, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...tion, which may gradually result in the trees incapability of survival in the long te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38440111421 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97476343517 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545961002786 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4799341655 49.2860985944 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.692307692 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6153846154 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140270676487 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592901242664 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289426998424 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892795355014 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00811866247658 0.0443174109184 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.