In 1990, new rules and guidelines were adopted in United Kingdom and that had changed the whole feel of Archaeology in that country. The new guidelines improved the situation in all 3 areas discussed in the passage. First, the new guidelines state that before any construction project can start, the construction site has to be examined by archaeologists to see whether the site is of archaeological interest or value. If the site is of archaeological interest, the next step is for the builders, archaeologists and local government officials to get together and make a plan for preserving the archaeological artifacts, either by building around them or by excavating a document in them properly before the construction is allowed to proceed.
Second, an important part of new guidelines is the rule that any archaeological work done on the construction site will be paid for by the construction company not by the government. The construction company has to pay for the initial examination of the site, and then for all the work carried out under the preservation plan. This is whole new source of financial support. The funding from the construction company has allowed researchers to study a far great range of archaeological sites than they could in past. Last, the new guidelines provide a lot of paid work for archaeologists, work that didn’t exist before. Expert archaeologists are now hired all stage of the process to examine the site for archaeological value, then have to drop the preservation plan to do the researcher and professional scientific manner and finally to process the data and write reports and articles. The increased job career opportunities in Archaeology have increased the number professional archaeologists in Britain which is now the highest it’s ever been.
the article states that there are a lot of problem that archaeologists faced with in the Unitied Kingdom that instigate archealogists decided to study and solve them, and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explians that the situation have been changed and those problema have reduced dramatically, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
first, the reading claims that with the growth of population in the UK, the number of construction projects also increased and a lot of valuable artifacts were lost in those sites. the professor opposite this point by saying that new site need archealogoy man to examin, and if there are interested thing in there, make that site plning for archealogists artifact.
second, the reading posits that financial support through government was insufficient. in contrasts, the professor explains that construction companies examine the dicovered sites, and archealogists supported by those companies nor goverment. according to the professor, this plan has great advantages, because make both many jobs and new large sites.
third, the reading says that roughly there are few positions for archealogists and many of them word in unrellavant jobs. the professor cast doubt on this point by explaining that new guidline lead many jobs, expert archealogists are hiring in related companies, when new site discovered, new employees needed for examination, preservation, and finally proceccing those place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | farshad_hom | 72 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 76
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 86
- ReadingThe cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers’ crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the t 90
- Question Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and example 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the article states that there are a lot of ...
^^^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
the article states that there are a lot of problem that archaeologists faced with in the U...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...es each of the authors reasons. first, the reading claims that with the growt...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ble artifacts were lost in those sites. the professor opposite this point by saying...
^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'things'?
Suggestion: things
... to examin, and if there are interested thing in there, make that site plning for arc...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...ing for archealogists artifact. second, the reading posits that financial supp...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reading posits that financial support through government was insufficient. in ...
^^
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t through government was insufficient. in contrasts, the professor explains that ...
^^
Line 13, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...orted by those companies nor goverment. according to the professor, this plan has great a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
... many jobs and new large sites. third, the reading says that roughly there ar...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... many of them word in unrellavant jobs. the professor cast doubt on this point by e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65470852018 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97334779674 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8489736046 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.111111111 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111124486823 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422393568581 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041534227771 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672216146504 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251312604565 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.