Advantages of casein based plastic

Essay topics:

Advantages of casein based plastic

Both the reading and the lecture discuss casein plastic packaging. The article states the advantages of casein-based plastic to reduce environmental pollution and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. Whereas, the professor mentions flaws and gainsays each benefit mentioned in the reading.

First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that casein packaging reduces waste as it is biodegradable. Moreover, casein is a milk protein that is not harmful to the environment. However, the professor states it will cause more damage to the environment as its water permeability is profound and there will be a need for extra packaging to protect the wrapped material. For this purpose, a synthetic layer will be added which will not degrade in the atmosphere. Thus, increasing the amount of waste.

Next, the professor further points on details that due to more water permeability of casein wrap, it is prone to do more food spoilage. Since the elasticity of this protein is low and allows water to absorb, it will change the taste of food. Therefore, this approach is not practical in terms of food. These claims refute the writer's implication that casein wraps not only protect the food from spoilage but also make the food stay fresh due to its capability to block oxygen molecules from its tiny pores. Therefore, it is not safe and effective during food distribution.

Ultimately, the article wraps its argument by declaring its nutritious value. Since casein is a milk protein, therefore, contains a great quantity of protein, hormones, and other chemicals that are healthy for the body. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this point by showing the inaccuracy of the author that it is not beneficial for all. As some people are allergic to dairy products, edible casein packaging will pose a threat to their life by causing a painful reaction. Thus, this is a drawback.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-03 sefeliz 76 view
2023-08-20 YasamanEsml 80 view
2023-08-20 YasamanEsml 88 view
2023-06-21 宋致遠 view
2023-06-14 Simin_MB 65 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Integrated TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... terms of food. These claims refute the writers implication that casein wraps not only ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11974110032 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75380761755 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0245864245 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204817820342 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601299046896 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100971710248 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140161045154 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136876265342 0.0443174109184 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.