Both reading and the lecture revolve around the assumptions regarding the way that Agnosids used to live and forage, according to the fossils and evidence. The writng suggests three different theories following this concept while the lecturer finds them dubious and cast doubt on the ideas mentioned in the paragraphs.
First, the article claims that the Agnosids may have been free-swimming predators because they were small enough to search for tiny organisms in the ocean and prey on them. In the contrast, the woman holds the view that the free-swimming predators usually have massive eyes with a well-developed vision to chase for food, while the Agnosids had small poorly developed eyes and some of them were even blind. Therefore, the mentioned idea about Agnosids is right due to the fact that no evidence was found about an acceptable vision level of them or a sensory organ to help them catch the prey.
Second, the writer suggests that the Agnosids were seafloor dwellers and survived by scavenging dead organisms or grazing on bacteria. On the contrary, the lecturer points out that the sea floor dwellers did not have the ability to move very fast for a long distance, thus, they were slow creatures whose habitats were small and limited. Yet, the fossil-based evidence shows that the Agnosids used to be tiny and could move fast for long distances. So this hypothesis is also wrong.
Furthermore, The author states that there is the possibility that Agnosids were parasites, living, and feeding from large organisms. Conversely, the speaker holds the view that parasites have a small and limited population while on the other hand, Agnosids had a large population based on the amount of discovered fossils. So this theory, like all aforementioned possibilities is worthless.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes 81
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples 76
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 80
- tpo50 integrated Writing 70
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13698630137 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69070005143 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568493150685 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5387222276 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901309876391 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340677159045 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269337011265 0.0662205650399 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529677330645 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198291348445 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.