air purification
The reading and the lecture are about the methods of air purification. The author of the reading feels that HEPA filters, Ozone purifiers, and UV air purifiers has a greater effect on the purification of air. The lecturer challenges all the claims made by the author and explains hereunder.
First of all, the professor implies that HEPA filters though they can eliminate many toxic particles, they cannot get rid of smaller ones. For instance, allergens which are smaller than 0.3 micrometres are very small to escape through HEPA filters. Furthermore, they grow in these filters and cause more serious implications when they are released. On the other hand, the writer states that HEPA filters traps all the toxic substances and produce cleaner eco-friendly air.
Secondly, the passage indicates that installing ozone purifiers will remove the unpleasant smells and also harmful chemicals that are airborne. However, the tutor argues with this particular statement and says that ozone is dangerous even though it removes bad smells, because the higher concentration of ozone will be harmful for our skin, eyes, and to different parts of our body. Moreover, we can relate this ozone purifier to normal ozone layer in the atmosphere which is dangerous when we are exposed.
Finally, the academician states that UV filters are not effective in cleaning away all the bacteria and also does not give much clean air to breathe. In addition to that they cannot filter the ciggarette smoke and other chemical fumes which are very harmful for the humans, which we want to get rid off. On the contrary, the reading posits that UV filters removes harmful bacteria even with microscopic harmful particles in the air and gives a cleaner environment to breathe and live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-06 | Safa Arshad | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-25 | Safa Arshad | 76 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | bhimsen | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | arun-kum6 | 80 | view |
- sea cows extinction 70
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 73
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ater effect on the purification of air. The lecturer challenges all the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13888888889 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59358033433 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7141583388 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06452816374 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167755265686 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677983185321 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113924410566 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119275969315 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131572169316 0.0443174109184 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.