an airship could become popular for use again.
The reading passage states that an airship could become popular for use again. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points in the reading.
First, considering the article that airship uses less fuel than a typical aircraft and it is making their fuel costs more economical. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that an airship uses Helium and Hedrosion as fuel. But Hedrosion is a dangerous fuel because it catchs fire easily and Helium is too expensive. So, an airship is not more efficient.
Second, the reading passage puts forward the idea that an airship has ability to carry very huge and heavy loads. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justified the information in the reading and makes the point that airships are so large and light. So, they are not so steady when carry huge staff like logs and this is so challenging for an airship.
Third, the article puts forward the idea that airships could be used to replace satellites and they could provide services for space research. At the same time, the speaker rejects the idea and adds that the problem is in high situations wind is so strong and also it needs a lot of fuel to be service function in space.
To sum up, both the writer and the speaker hold conflicting views about airships could become popular in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76694915254 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39896005311 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5741596293 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423214313266 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16666605293 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197737520345 0.0662205650399 299% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250769143191 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146445269759 0.0443174109184 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.