Altruism in meerkat and humans
The reading passage states that an altruistic person or animal have no or little reward by his acts. However, the professor contradicts this using example of people and meerkats.
First, the full guts sentinel. Professor said that some time ago, scientific though that sentinels sacrifice their food in order to be aware of any danger whilst the others Meerkat are eating. But now, science have found that sentinel has always eaten before doing his job
Second first to see first to escape. The passage states that sentinels put themselves in danger when a predator is coming. However, professor contradicts this saying that event though sentinel is alone, is the first to see the predator, so it has more chances to run and survive.
Finally, is donation pure altruism?. Even though, body organs donation could benefit family member’s o stranger, the professor states that the donator has a non material reward which is to receive the appreciation from the society and from himself. Hence, the lecturer suggest that this reward could explain the people behaviors.
In summary, the professor give three examples that contradicts the theory states in the passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-16 | Sovychok | 3 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Shubham Patel | 82 | view |
- People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing 93
- some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. OTher young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situation do you think is better? 70
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? 73
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? 90
- How do movies or television influence people’s behavior? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...hat an altruistic person or animal have no or little reward by his acts. However, ...
^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organs'' or 'organ's'?
Suggestion: organs'; organ's
...ation pure altruism?. Even though, body organs donation could benefit family member&ap...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25396825397 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51896310157 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.70407013 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0455034828742 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221072649089 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051372745187 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0192317589392 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235937625258 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.