any
The reading and the lecture are about the decline of Torreta tyxifolia and the ways to address the problem. The author of the reading states that there are three ways in order to address the problem and provides the reasons of support. However, the lecturer states that the solutions won't be successful and refutes each of the author's support.
First of all, the author mentions that they can reestablish Torreya in the same location where it thrived for many years in an area which has a specific microclimate. This microclimate is wetter and cooler that will help the plant to survive. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She states that the area which has the microclimate has been affected and its temperature is affected by changes in temperature of the larger area. Furthermore, she mentions that this has resulted in the area becoming drier and unsuitable for Torreya's growth.
Secondly, the writer posits that the Torreya can be shifted to a different location, further north from Florida, where the climate is cooler. Also, since the plant has thrived in the past, relocating it to the same region could be helpful. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument. According to her, the plant, Black locust, was moved to the same region far north and it created havoc to the surrounding region. She mentions that it spread quickly and damaged other plants and trees in the same region that were on the verge of extinction.
Finally, the author states that Torreya can be preserved in research centers. The reading suggests that it will be useful for the scientists to protect the species from dying as well as conducting research on it. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that in a research center, the population of the plant would be very less as compared to that in a jungle and the population won't be able to resist the diseases. The lecturer explains that in the jungle, there is a huge population of these trees that are genetically diverse and hence able to survive. But, inside a research center, without the diversity and without the large population, the species won't be able to survive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | saba.es | 83 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | saamaan | 80 | view |
- any 3
- These days people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time Going to a mu 71
- TOEFL T P O 18 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 68
- These days, people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations. Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them. What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time?•Going t 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ulation of the plant would be very less as compared to that in a jungle and the po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90027700831 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54815124988 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459833795014 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8433463486 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2777777778 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.