The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, the lecturer refutes all of the claims made by the article and thinks that it will be more harmful.
The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, the lecturer refutes all of the claims made by the article and thinks that it will be more harmful.
First, the article states that if the employees work only 4 days a week then they will most likely be more active and alert as they will have sufficient rest, thus decreasing the chances of making errors which could be costly for the company. However, the lecturer says that if the worker only works 4 days then the company have to hire new employees due to which the company has to spend more money on the workers and other costs associated with them such as their medical costs. Moreover, more space in the office will be occupied because of the new employees and it will eventually cut off the profit of the company.
Secondly, the article posits that because of this change more people will get jobs to cover up the work left by the employees. However, the lecturer is against this idea and says that the company will have high expectations from the new employees to do the job similarly as it is being done by the employee who left it.
Finally, the article states that this change will benefit the employees highly by saying that there will be more free time for them. The employees will be able to have a good time with their family members due to which there will significant improvement in their social as well as family life. However, the lecturer states that the individual might be in risk after the change. According to him, if an employee works for only 4 days a week then the company will surely prioritize the ones who are working 5 days a week. Moreover, if there is any downturn in the company then the ones working 4 days only will have serious chances of losing the job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | mukesh7542 | 65 | view |
- The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, 65
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year 77
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college."-Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the po 66
- Earthworms have a beneficial effect on the physical and chemical properties of soil. Earthworms change the structure of the soil and improve water drainage. As earthworms dig through compacted soil, they ingest the soil and grind it up. They move organic 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... of this. However, the lecturer refutes all of the claims made by the article and thinks t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51267605634 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27700788923 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433802816901 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2823227455 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504639700363 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21020694699 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190880751393 0.0662205650399 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382475878076 0.162205337803 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.251698322544 0.0443174109184 568% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.2367328918 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.