The reading states that there are several reason that show sending people to an asteroid would be the best colonization option. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and not practical, so refutes them all with specific details.
First, the reading states that astreroisa are smaller that plants, and they gave lower gravity, so spaceship can land on them easily. On the contrary, the professor mentioned the fact that low gravity is not a benefit in all ways, and have some risk for human body, in low gravity musels mass and boun density reduces, and in a long time can be very harmful for human health.
Furthermore, the author argues that some astrroid have several valuable element and metals that are very rare on Easth, so an asteroid colony would be profitable. Conversaly, the speaker brings up the idea that cost of soppurting the prosses of mining can be very high and the profite of this action would be reduses, also the cost of selling this metal can be different from Earth, because the quality of this metal and elements are different in compare to Earth metal.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that some of the asteroids would be easy to reach because some of them get close to Earth. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that going to asteroid might be easy but returing from them would be difficult, because asteroid move quickly and some times go far than Mars, so returning frome them would be very challenging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
The reading states that there are several reason that show sending people to an asteroid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the reading passage holds the view that some of the asteroids would be easy to reach becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76136363636 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33141093083 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6102497674 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.125 110.228320801 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749931329208 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397251876424 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312556520922 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461457183976 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209436650216 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.