Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss how agnostids were live as marine animals,and extinct about 450 million years ago. While, the reading passage state that there are several theories about hoe agnostides may have lived. the lecture refutes this,by saying that all the theories were weak, and cannot take it.
First of all, the reading claims that agnostides have been free swimming predators that hunted smaller animals.However, the lecture argues that agnostides were weak vision or totally blind so they were unable to swim.And maybe they had a special sensor to hunting animals.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments is that dwelled on the seafloor, and survived by scavenging dead organisms. The lecture counter this point by stating that agnostids had the ability to move fast and to far area, while the seafloor lived in localized area.
In conclusion, the reading argues that agnostids there is the possibility were parasites,living and feeding on larger organisms.The lecture refutes this claims by saying that parasites lived in certain limit area, and fed in whole organisms.
Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss how agnostids were live as marine animals,and extinct about 450 million years ago. While, the reading passage state that there are several theories about hoe agnostides may have lived. the lecture refutes this,by saying that all the theories were weak, and cannot take it.
First of all, the reading claims that agnostides have been free swimming predators that hunted smaller animals.However, the lecture argues that agnostides were weak vision or totally blind so they were unable to swim.And maybe they had a special sensor to hunting animals.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments is that dwelled on the seafloor, and survived by scavenging dead organisms. The lecture counter this point by stating that agnostids had the ability to move fast and to far area, while the seafloor lived in localized area.
In conclusion, the reading argues that agnostids there is the possibility were parasites,living and feeding on larger organisms.The lecture refutes this claims by saying that parasites lived in certain limit area, and fed in whole organisms.
- tpo 18 80
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 70
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ow agnostids were live as marine animals,and extinct about 450 million years ago. Wh...
^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd extinct about 450 million years ago. While, the reading passage state that there a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...es about hoe agnostides may have lived. the lecture refutes this,by saying that all...
^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
...may have lived. the lecture refutes this,by saying that all the theories were weak,...
^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...g predators that hunted smaller animals.However, the lecture argues that agnostides wer...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...tally blind so they were unable to swim.And maybe they had a special sensor to hunt...
^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , living
... there is the possibility were parasites,living and feeding on larger organisms.The lec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...,living and feeding on larger organisms.The lecture refutes this claims by saying t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 176.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34659090909 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6579190794 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9901043911 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.591354664224 0.272083759551 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290882636356 0.0996497079465 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.252806323073 0.0662205650399 382% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337094182032 0.162205337803 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.296638401444 0.0443174109184 669% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.