The reading and the lecture are both about establishing new rules and regulations about using coal ash which is a waste material produced by burning coal. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about how the representatives of coal's firms disagree with these new laws. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. He claims that it must be strick rules for handling and storing ash.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states rules already existed and its applied in their market. The article mentions that one of the rules is to use linear to prevent coal ash from going inside soil and the srounded environment. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that these regulations are not sufficient and liner used only when making new land fill. Additionally, he points out that using linear in all process make harmful damage to ground water which used to drink by people.
Secondly, the author suggests establish hard rules may discourage companies from recycle ash to other material like concrete. In the article it is said that people will stop buy these products because they may feel its harm for them. Again,the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states consumers will not stop buy coal ash products. He goes on to say that by giving an example of dangorus materail call mercury which strick rules applied to deal with it, and it succesfully recycled, Also consumers will not became afraid from using it.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that corporations will increse the price of coal products because its cost will increase also. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by contending that the results worth this extra cost for the coal. He notes that implements these rules will cost 15 billion dollar, but will increse electricity bill around 1 percent, which is not a big price to have clean environment.
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 40 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmosphe 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Reading Time 3 minutes In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...e they may feel its harm for them. Again,the speaker specifically addresses this poi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...fully recycled, Also consumers will not became afraid from using it. Finally, the a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...products because its cost will increase also. Not surprisingly, the professor takes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99695121951 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56291847035 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564024390244 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2268400893 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170993851859 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569718129137 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060679165792 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108118373662 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544191249451 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.