Buzzers
In set of the materials, the writer strongly postualtes that buzzing, which is a person to person advertizing technique, should be delegalized. He provides three reasons to endorse this suggestion. On the other hand, the lecturer states that this is really misleading, illogical and gives a wrong impression abou such an advertisemnt method, and gainsays each of the argument mentioned in the writing.
First and foremost, the passage begins by asserting that the consumers are harmed as a result of ill-informed about the product by such paid agents who have an ulterior motive of selling out their product through out overrrating it. Nonetheless the professor maintains that, these promoters, inspite of getting paid, they beilieve in what they promote in light of having been happily long experienced with it, which in and of its self, was the only cause they were hired in the first place. He exemplifies on this by his own good phone service that he really reckons as great therefore the company recruited him.
Next, the man further points on that usually people bombard the seller with tons of questions about almost every aspect such as the price, seervice and how long the buzzer has used the product. If there was not an approriate answer, they would not purchase it. This refutes the writer's implications that buyers gullibly accept the buzzed good depending on just knowing the seller, without investigating it.
ultimately, the passage wraps up by declaring that such a kind of promotion is devastating on the fabric of society. This is courtesy of the people having become suspicious about their fellow community members who may be selling agents with a hidden agenda. The speaker in the audio rebuts this by insisting that the opposite is true. This is courtesy of, not just are the buzzers sincere, but also they give the buyers good experience, therefor the trust is boosted among society members and evenyually the social bondage is reinforced.
- Tpo 29 70
- Artificial sweetener 3
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- A person should do job which he loves but gives him low salary or a job providing high sakty but not like 73
- It is better for children to choose the job that is very similar to their parent than to choose a completely different job explain your answers with reasons 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ohibited to perform their work. As they dont give cues to the consumers that they ar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...personally experiment with the product. Therefore they are not making people perplexed, o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...pany does not recruit that agent again. because their experiences with people are flour...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 22.412803532 245% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1373.03311258 155% => OK
No of words: 401.0 270.72406181 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31920199501 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72518949697 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 145.348785872 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526184538653 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 419.366225166 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1214714605 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.470588235 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901302521113 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386375711888 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705515668135 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937230408438 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758817422136 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 63.6247240618 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.