Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, which uses hydrogen to create electricity that, in turn, powers the car. Fuel-cell engines have several advantages over internal-combustion engines and will probably soon replace them.
One of the main problems with the internal-combustion engine is that it relies on petroleum, either in the form of gasoline or diesel fuel. Petroleum is a finite resource; someday, we will run out of oil. The hydrogen needed for fuel-cell engines cannot easily be depleted. Hydrogen can be derived from various plentiful sources, including natural gas and even water. The fact that fuel-cell engines utilize easily available, renewable resources makes them particularly attractive.
Second, hydrogen-based fuel cells are attractive because they will solve many of the world's pollution problems. An unavoidable by-product of burning oil is carbon dioxide, and carbon dioxide harms the environment. On the other hand, the only byproduct of fuel-cell engines is water.
Third, fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive because people will spend less money to operate a fuel-cell engine than they will to operate an internal-combustion engine. This is true for one simple reason: a fuel-cell automobile is nearly twice as efficient in using its fuel as an automobile powered by an internal-combustion engine is. In other words, the fuel-cell powered car requires only half the fuel energy that the internal-combustion powered car does to go the same distance.
The article and the lecturer are both about diferenciation between fuel cell engine and internal combustion engine. The author of reading feels that fuel cell engines have several advantages over internal combustion engines. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks fuel engines have disadvantges.
First of all, the author argues that hydrogen needed for fule cell engines. The article notes that hudrogen can be derived from various plentiful sources including natural gass and even water. This pint is challenged by the lecturer. He claims hydrogen is not easily available device as use pure liquid stage. Furthermore, he says that this stage very dificult to produce and not much practicaly do.
Secondly, the author suggest that hydrogen based fuel cells unavoid to produce carbon dioxside and this way is attactive for enveroment polution . The article notes that this fuel cell engines give water as by product. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that pure hydrogen liquid are not purify hundered present. He elobarates onthis by mentioning that hyderogen fuel cell engines is not solution for envernment polution by vehicles.
Finaly, the author states that fuel cell engine econmically competitive because people will spend less money to operate fuel cell engines. Moreover, fuel cell powered car requires only half the fuel engergy than the internal combustion powerded car doess to go the same distance. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that fuel cell engines have to use platinum. He notes that it is very expensive.
- Essay topics: In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States —birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these tren 85
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 60
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tages over internal combustion engines. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...allenges the claims made by the author. The lecturer thinks fuel engines have disad...
^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s unavoid to produce carbon dioxside and this way is attactive for enveroment pol...
^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...way is attactive for enveroment polution . The article notes that this fuel cell e...
^^
Line 9, column 302, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'purified'.
Suggestion: purified
...gests that pure hydrogen liquid are not purify hundered present. He elobarates onthis ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40562248996 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55316587789 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8419455628 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7777777778 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8333333333 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274583273824 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838654101412 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695713125375 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168133520235 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516347231403 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.