the cloud seeding
The reading and listening materials have a conflict of opinions about the cloud seeding, which these clouds produce harmless rain or snow instead of hail and hails make a lot of problems for farmers. The reading passage refers to the three evidences that support of the efficiency of the cloud seeding. On the other hand, the speaker in the lecture disagrees with these points that mentioned in the passage.
First of all, the writer in the reading passage explains that the laboratory experiments support that they are very effective because they can produce light snow instead of hail pellets. By contrast, the professor holds an opposite view. She believes that it can make different and bad problems and damages to the environment like lacking water and clouds do not produce rain.
Second, the author discusses that some counties in the Asia have the successful experiment in the urban area so that it can have a good result in the United States. In contrast, according to the professor, she makes it clear that Asian countries have a good result because it happens in the polluted areas. But this results in the farming areas of the United States do not repeat again because they are not polluted and it might be a relationship between pollution and the cloud seeding.
As a final point, the writer refers to the local studies that these studies confirm that the cloud seeding reduces hail damage compared to last years. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that this event happens in the small area, not whole the area so that it is not convincing that the cloud seeding can decrease the damage in different areas.
To sum up, the reading passage makes three arguments to support the efficiency of the cloud seeding. However, the speaker views this issue from a different angle.
- Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 60
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 70
- Rather than help children with their schoolwork parents should encourage their children do their work independently 83
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 43
- a buzzer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeat'.
Suggestion: repeat
...rming areas of the United States do not repeat again because they are not polluted and it mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90819672131 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40563702417 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488524590164 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6447653855 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246841873438 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083712293407 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865231644624 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136600757589 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970030463529 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.