The article and the lecture both discuss whether the coins discovered by native american one thousand years ago are fake or real. The reading claims that they do not belong to the Norse. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's assessment and provide three reasons to support his claims
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is the possibility that the coins do not belong to the Norse because they were discovered in places far away from the settlements. The lecturer refuted this point by stating that the Norse settlers did not stay in one place instead they kept moving from one place to another.
Secondly, according to the text the absence of other coins in the same location is a proof that they are fake coins. The speaker finds this idea debatable, he bolsters his opinion by stating that The Norse collected all they coins when they travel led back to Europe. Therefore, Archaeologist were not able to discover other coins in the same location. Moreover, practically speaking, the Norse did not bring back the coins with them
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that native Americans found these coins as invaluable. He contends that even though the coins did not have materialistic value, they still considered beautiful. According to the lecturer native American used them as jewelry to enhance their beauty. Therefore, they were being carried by the Norse.
- coins Norse 60
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 3
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s that they do not belong to the Norse. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rse. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors assessment and provide three reasons to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... three reasons to support his claims The first allegation of the script against ...
^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n places far away from the settlements. The lecturer refuted this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'coin'
Suggestion: coin
...ating that The Norse collected all they coins when they travel led back to Europe. Th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they were being carried by the Norse.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08016877637 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4862168788 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552742616034 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.701534382 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329119759421 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118471002598 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967172834887 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191573605908 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112267595681 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.