The speaker disputes the author's suggested theory that creating a fund to protect forests would lead to the preservation of forests. He provides several reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims
First, according to the author providing funds to encourage farmers to plant their fields would prevent companies from demolishing forests because farmers would resist this move. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He asserts that indeed this may not serve the purpose. The lecturer argues that farmers would be looking at way to use this money to increase their yields. He asserts that the use of fertilizers and pesticides would have a deter mental effect on polluting the environment.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since people would have more money to resist the destruction of forests, they might be able to preserve it. However, the lecturer again refutes these claims. He argues that these fields belong to the governments and not to people. Thus, providing these funds would not go to the real beneficiary, and therefore it would not help to protect the forests
Finally, the author claims the fund would protect forests because it may preserve the diversity of species. However, the lecturer disputes these claims. He contends that the money offered would not protect diversity of species because farmers would interested of planting trees only which might help to create a diverse ecosystem
- TPO28 -Peary’s claim 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: A university education should be provided for free of charge to all interested scholars.Use examples and reasons to support your position. 73
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f fertilizers and pesticides would have a deter mental effect on polluting the environm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al effect on polluting the environment. Second, the lecturer contradicts the fal...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...ersity of species because farmers would interested of planting trees only which might help...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, may, second, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2660944206 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49572199318 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3815937807 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0654569540601 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242343300814 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277350071193 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452571466392 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00664692443944 0.0443174109184 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.