Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, however, is that any Internet user can contribute a new article or make an editorial change in an existing one. As a result, the encyclopedia is authored by the whole community of Internet users.
communal online encyclopedias are now being used in internet. they are wrriten by whole community of internet users sharing their knowledge and perspectives over different topics. however, comparing to traditional encyclopedias, there are some problems which are not quite serious considering the benefits of communal online encyclopedias.
First of all, traditional encyclopedias were written by trained experts but in these communal encyclopedias, the writers doen not necessarily trained for writing. Although, these online sources have more chance to be corrected by other people, despite old versions with mistakes remaining for decades.
Secondly, online sources can be a target for hackers or vandals to change or delete the contents in order to fabricate the informations. however, online websites managed some rules to avoid these situations and crucial facts are not able to be changed and they are read-only for most of the users.
Last but not least, there are many topics discussed in these online sources but it does not mean to discuss unimportant topics and let the important ones vanish. it means because of the more space exists in online versions than tradtional ones, many topics can be disscussed which did not have the chance to be proposed before. Thus, the diversity of subjects disscussed in online encyclopediad are quite more than traditional versions.
- Tpo41Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing 80
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOP 47.Pterosaurs reptile powered flight ability 3
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communal
communal online encyclopedias are now being used...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...opedias are now being used in internet. they are wrriten by whole community of inter...
^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...and perspectives over different topics. however, comparing to traditional encyclopedias...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...in order to fabricate the informations. however, online websites managed some rules to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...pics and let the important ones vanish. it means because of the more space exists ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56074766355 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91353922308 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6482226989 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311903311586 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12992629941 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751108027967 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184395547008 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568521255923 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.