dinosaurs are endotherms
The reading passage state that dinosaurs are endotherms. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, the article considers dinosaurs as an endotherm because of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions and this evidence show that dinosaurs could keep their body temperatures constant in contrast the professor contradicts the idea and talk about other theories like maybe the polar regions were more wormer than today or maybe dinosaurs migrate from other areas to this region or hibernate like modern reptiles.
Second, the reading claims that running is efficient only if an animal's legs are positioned underneath its body and dinosaurs are the same. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that dinosaurs need such this legs for supporting huge wight of dinosaurs and such this body needs this structure.
Third, the author in the reading puts forward the idea that a connection between endothermy and bone structure allows the animal to grow quickly. In the same way, the speaker in the lecture validats the idea and adds that in some situations reptiles growing more slowly in cool enviroment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | joeyrussell007 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- tpo13 3
- Q1 3
- Problems with writer s explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56736600969 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.441654138 49.2860985944 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.142857143 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287583555401 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10531921828 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105850079043 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143743643707 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10573265091 0.0443174109184 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.