Dinosaurs as endotherm animals
Scientists are not in agreement about dinosaurs being endotherms. the first argument that they make is with the idea of polar dinosaurs. Some scientists think that it is not compeling reason to say that just because a lot of the fossils found are in the polar regions, and living in the cold regions is not possibel during the cold season, they must be endotherms. They just as well could have been reptiles that migrate during the cold season.
Another difference of opinion between scientists is that some don't believe that the legs being positioned under the body is an evidence of being an endotherm. they think it could just be result of their evolution, because from physiological stand point, the legs under the body can support much higher weights. Although this idea does not explain anything about the activity of the dinosaurs.
Although the scientists agree on the existance of Haversian canals in the fossils, some say there are evidence of something called growth rings in fossiles that slows down the growth process in cold periods. This is important because an endotherm has a rapid growth, no regards to weather. Therefore the cannot be endotherms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | joeyrussell007 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- Will American wood companies go eco-friendly 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and risks rather than doing what they already know how to do well.use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- tpo-11-indepenent 3
- Will American wood companies go eco-friendly 76
- Will American wood companies go eco-friendly 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ement about dinosaurs being endotherms. the first argument that they make is with t...
^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...opinion between scientists is that some dont believe that the legs being positioned ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...y is an evidence of being an endotherm. they think it could just be result of their ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e body can support much higher weights. Although this idea does not explain anything abo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... a rapid growth, no regards to weather. Therefore the cannot be endotherms.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01025641026 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55585339716 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1967844828 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0656986853768 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308946875617 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495359732995 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426885799661 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00555523485849 0.0443174109184 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.