Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Be specialist in one subject is thought by some to be the best way for constructing our studies; however, others beg to differ and highlight the privileges of learning several subjects. After carefully weighing all subtle points, I fervently agree that exploring several subjects appears to be a better strategy. I feel this way because students become a broad-minded as well as creative and they have a head start when it comes to job hunting.
Intially, it goes without saying that grasping knowledge from different spheres paves the way for people to think broadly and be highly creative, which is very essential for surviving in recent world. To be more specific, it is not a secret that during our lives we have to make relationships with all walks of life and do verious jobs. As a result, by learning many subjects students can use different spheres for having a sharp increase in their productivity. My own example is compeling demonstration of this idea. During my University years, I used to study verious subjects. As a result, now when I am a menager of tourists compnay In Dubai, I make use of my knowlege about the environmental problems, different people psychology and so forth. As a result, I can easily attract lots of tourists because I know very well what thay want to see. A month ago I have tourists from Japan and I use their traditional meals and costums, which I study at university, for easily attract them. All in all, my own example is a vivid demonstration of the idea that exploring verious subjects people tend to become open-minded and highly creative.
Additionally, by putting the discussion forth, it is worthwhile to mention the adventages of getting a job of those people who explore different subjects. It is universally accepted that modern market has lots of fluctuations and no one knows when their professional sphere might have shorteges of strong workforce. As a reslult, it becomes highly difficult to find an appropriate job for making ends meet. However, after learning verious subjects people have a head start. My example is a lembend illustration of this point of view. Before getting a job in a tourist company, I had hard time to find a job. Nevertheless, I had explored different subjects at university, particularly Computer Science. As a result, It smooths the way for me to get a job in high-tech company and fulfill my needs before I can get a job in a tourist company. In short my example showes that people can get a job much easier if they study differnt subjects.
In summary, after taking into consideration the aforementioned influential forces, I frimly believe that the adventages of learing verious subjects overwigh the privileges of being a specialist in one paritcular subject.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-31 | liuyuchen | 89 | view |
2018-05-17 | SweetAngel | 73 | view |
2017-03-18 | Denisjan777 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 73
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer ? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 73
- What is a very important skill for a person in order to be successful in the world today. Chose one skill and use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (thay) must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ists because I know very well what thay want to see. A month ago I have tourists fro...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, i feel, in short, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 22.412803532 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1373.03311258 167% => OK
No of words: 465.0 270.72406181 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92688172043 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.04702891845 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97424408481 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 145.348785872 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498924731183 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 419.366225166 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 3.25607064018 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 1.25165562914 719% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0021558963 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.136363636 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1363636364 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40909090909 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146877845629 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445380957842 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048629471477 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10609098214 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327978417308 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 63.6247240618 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.