Edmontosaurus’s likely migration
The reading and the lecture are both about the elephant-size dinosaur which were called Edmontosaurus’s likely migration during extremely cold and dark winters in Alaska. Accordingly, the author provides three theories to prove this migration. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of these theories presented in the passage. The lecturer is of the opinion that hardly these claims are capable of giving credence to this migration.
Firstly, author argues that these animals were dependent on plant as their only source of their food. Since scarcely plants could grow in the harsh and frigid climate of the region, dinosaurs were pushed to migrate to find food. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. According to her, 100 million years ago the weather seems to be warmer than today, and 24-hour sunshine right in the middle of sky in the summer lead to plants grow exceedingly and profoundly. Subsequently, all these plants died in the winter, and could produced a bunch of notorious dead plants which could feed dinosaurs and release them from immigration.
Secondly, the writer disputes that finding many skeletons of these animals in the region lead to concluding that they lived in herds; Therefore, they could have migrated because living in herd help managing it. The lecture, in contrast, opposes this notion by asserting that living in herds can occur because of other reasons including protection against enemies. The professor presented an example of Rosa welt which lives in forest in order to support her assertation that not all animals living in herds immigrate downright.
Finally, the writer averts that although there was a long distance between their habitat and the destination of migration, however these animals could run fast and were able of this departure. The lecturer’s stance is that the writer has not considered the young ones which were not physically prepare for these long distances. Moreover, she points outs that the young animals slowed down the herd from running and adults were not capable of living them behind because they could not protect themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | talelaldabous | 65 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | zahra.tmmm | 3 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-22 | ipari5a | 78 | view |
- did Sinasauropteryx have feather or not Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 80
- the chevalier s escape from the prison 66
- do you agree or disagree that athletes and entertainers deserve to have more privacy than what they have now. 60
- do you agree or this agree that entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than what they have now 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...se plants died in the winter, and could produced a bunch of notorious dead plants which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to manage' or 'manage'.
Suggestion: to manage; manage
...ve migrated because living in herd help managing it. The lecture, in contrast, opposes t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19197707736 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58994406903 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0346328347 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871405767279 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292191878489 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750652622794 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549749241062 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603601548893 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.