The professor lectured on the topic given in the passage by discussing that many scientists are disagreed that the dinosars are endotherms. The argument provided by the professors are given below.
First of all, the passage mentioned that the polar dinosaurs' fossils have been discovered in polar regions explains that these dinosaurs can maintain the body temperature in cold climates which is one of the features of endotherms. However, the professor refuted this claim as the temprature of the polar region is believed to be more warmer when dinosars were there. Also, it is possible that these dinosaurs migrated to other place or hybrated as other reptiles in colder season.
Secondly, the passage suggested that the possition and movement of dinosaurs' legs allows sustained physical activity such as running. Though, the professor discussed that the legs of these dinosaurs are underneath the body to carry more body weight. So by giving alternate argument, it is clear that the dinosaurs are not endotherm.
At last, the passage mentioned haversian canals in order to explain how dinosaurs has similar bone structure as endotherms. Notwithstanding, the lecturer described the evidence against this argument. These dinosaurs have 'growth rings' which actually affect their body growth. In cooler time, the growth of bones of dinosaurs become slow or almost stop and in warmer time they show rapid growth. However, the endotherms grow despite any climate situations.
All in all, the professor has provided enough counter points to explain how dinosaurs are not endotherms. Thus, the passage seems not conclusive in order to explain its main point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'warmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: warmer
...e of the polar region is believed to be more warmer when dinosars were there. Also, it is p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ined physical activity such as running. Though, the professor discussed that the legs ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39846743295 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69825937074 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3680172877 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130982765567 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427817718714 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411873658285 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065730367643 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493238994194 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.