A fake silver coin
The recently found silver coin which could be dated back to the eleventh century was lead to a long-running debate about whether the natives had a connection with the Norse, a group of European travellers. The passage mentions that some argue that the coin is fake and there was none of contact between Native American and the Norse. But the lecture considers them unconvincing.
The passage begins by arguing that the location which the coin was found is far away from the Norse settlements, which is located in eastern Canada. Nevertheless, the lecture counters this, pointing out that there are other things in the main site of Native American which clearly did not belong to them. An propriate explanation is the Native American travelled across the north america to the site of the Norse, and get in touch with them. As a result, they bring many things back to their main site from the Norse. Therefore, the assertion of the passage does not sound reasoning.
Furthermore, the passage assumes that none of other coin was found at the Norse's Canadian sites. The lecture, however, suggests this may not be merited by the evidence. It is possible that the Norse brings many products to north america from Europe, and they decided to bring them back when they are preparing to finish their travel in America. Coins, as valuable matter, would obviously be classified in the top level, and few of coins will be left in America. The passage cannot bolster the recommendation without ruling out the refutation.
Last but not the least important, even if the evidence turns out to support the passage that the Native American know nothing about silver coins, thus it is usefulless in North America, one critical fact is being left out of consideration. The lecture points out the passage neglects the truth that the Native American loves any products which is beautiful and shiny, especially with some complex pattern. Although they may not recognize silver coins as money, they would also be attracted with its design and texture. The passage must explain more presuasively to reach the cited conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ack to the eleventh century was lead to a long-running debate about whether the natives had a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...n which clearly did not belong to them. An propriate explanation is the Native Ame...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98583569405 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52689630199 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515580736544 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2089891371 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167108137419 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485387133172 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670012065101 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112867282144 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769896547548 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.