The writing and lecture are both discussing about geneticcally modification food. However, the professor is giving the lecture to oppose the ideas from the writing which claim the three benefit from genetic modification food. Here are the three main point about this controversial topic
Frist of all, the lecture has defect what the author stated that genetic technology help shorten the time of natural selection, development of the better crop. In reality, genes take to hundreds and thousand of years to change with a lot of challenge and effects from the environments. Therefore, better crops which results from better genes cannot be development in a matter of time
The second point from the writing assures the safety of the genetic modification food. The professor refute this view by providing fact of current practice. There is hardly any public peer review on these kind of food products because of competition. Company's research often being kept secret so competition can not make copy.
Finally, the lecture question the ability genetic modified food can help underdeveloped country to prevent the food shortage and famine. These countries as struggle as the are, these country can hardly have access to the infrastructure of creating genetic modification technology. Also, these kind of food are consider higher price in the market. This cannot be a stable solution solve the food shortage and prevent famine.
- dinosaurs endotherm 81
- Parents make the best teachers. Do you agree with that statement? Use specific examples and reasons to explain your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree to the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reason and examples to support your answer. 60
- Genetically Modified Food Every organism possesses genes. These genes provide the organism with its natural characteristics. The number of apples a tree will produce can be considered a result of its genetic makeup. With new technologies, researchers have 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'defected'.
Suggestion: defected
... topic Frist of all, the lecture has defect what the author stated that genetic tec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... In reality, genes take to hundreds and thousand of years to change with a lot of challe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...enetic modification food. The professor refute this view by providing fact of current ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ere is hardly any public peer review on these kind of food products because of competition...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... genetic modification technology. Also, these kind of food are consider higher price in th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...echnology. Also, these kind of food are consider higher price in the market. This cannot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, so, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31718061674 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72542359733 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4991408859 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.583333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209314116048 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741390042483 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339533847288 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116814132683 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047777713022 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.