Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T

Essay topics:

Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.

One-Way Glass

One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.

Colorful Designs

A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.

Magnetic Field

The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions—either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.

The article illustrates that there are three solutions to prevent the glass injuries to bird, while the lecturer disputes those ideas with several proofs.

According to the article, the first way is to use one-way glass, so the bird cannot see in. In contrast, the professor in the lecture maintains that it will not work. He advances the theory by saying that, the one-way glass has a big problem that birds from the outside will see the reflection like a mirror. The one-way glass is just like the regular glass, because it will reflect the sky or the tree, and birds cannot understand it is a reflection instead they will think it is true. Thus, using one-way glass will make birds think what they see is true, and it will not work.

In addition, the writer holds that they can paint colorful lines on regular window, then birds will see those stripes and avoid it. However, the professor casts doubt on the opinion mentioned in the passage. He states that since people in the building can see out, and there are open holes in the building. Therefore, birds will fly right through the window, unless the hole is very small. However, in this way, the room will be very dark. So, painting the glass cannot work.

Finally, it is depicted in the reading that they can build artificial magnetic, so the bird can sense it and change the direction. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes that birds do have the ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields to navigate, but they only use it for long distance like migration. For example, if birds migrate from cold countries to warm area, they will use it finding which way to go. However, they do not use it in short distance like one city to another. In this way, birds use eyes and lights to find the direction. Therefore, this method is not effective, because birds do not use magnetic field to guide short distance flying.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-15 nusybah 88 view
2023-06-27 YasamanEsml 80 view
2023-06-15 Vivian Chang 78 view
2023-02-26 rodriannnn 76 view
2023-01-29 reza_fattahi 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user shuya :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in short, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67878787879 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26459149863 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50303030303 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.09816705 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7777777778 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266284713968 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926666763216 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550980416027 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158312990918 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341189309068 0.0443174109184 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.