According to the reading passage, it is stated that although glass is a favored material for the state-of-the-art architecture, it is significantly perilous for wild birds. These birds can not distinguish between glass or open air, and frequently they harm themselves by flying through glass windows of buildings. The reading provides the reasons to deal with this problem. However, the professor in the listening states, why the assumptions mentioned in the reading passage were not correct, and refutes them by describing three reasons as follows.
Firstly, the reading claims that replacing the regular glass with one-way glass - which is transparent in only one direction - can be problem solving. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that these kinds of glasses reflect like a mirror to the bird outside. Hence, they would operate as bad as a regular glass, and the bird might comprehend the reflection on the glass as sky.
Secondly, the article posits that another solution for making regular window glasses recognizable for the birds, is to paint colorful designs on them. In contrast, the professor says that birds would perceive the openings in the design as holes which they can fly through. Therefore, unlike what is indicated in the reading, these paintings will not be effective, unless they paint the glass as a whole. He asserts that this approach makes rooms to dark for the people inside, thus, it also can not be practical.
Finally, the reading says that due to the birds' ability of sensing Earth's magnetic field, creating an artificial magnetic field can work out in guiding birds away from buildings. The professor opposes this point by explaining that although birds can use Earth's magnetic field to navigate, it is not useful for short distances. According to the professor, when birds migrate from a cold country to a warm one before the winter, they use this ability; but when they want to fly from one side of the city to other sites, they use their eyes rather than the ability to sense Earth's magnetic field. As a result, this solution will not work out either.
- are negatives of photographs ansel adams work or not 76
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Artificial reefs have several benefits Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many 80
- TPO62 76
- Advantages of Airships over other aircrafts Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories presented in the reading passage 80
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y describing three reasons as follows. Firstly, the reading claims that replaci...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the reflection on the glass as sky. Secondly, the article posits that anothe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, thus, it also can not be practical. Finally, the reading says that due to th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...nally, the reading says that due to the birds ability of sensing Earths magnetic fiel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99715099715 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59230791936 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532763532764 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3145910344 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349900014858 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122021312782 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110077806472 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223802879361 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701554743557 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.