glasses and birds
The reading asserts that Mars and Moon are considered as suitable alternatives as living planets, though Venus's harsh and inhospitable environment makes it impossible [S1] for humans to inhabit. The reading discusses three reasons to support this claim. However.[S2] the speaker casts doubt on each of them.
First and foremost, the reading mentions Venus's pressure is 90 times more that of Erath's; so almost everything on the venus [S3] will be crushed over in only a few hours after landing. The speaker, however, suggests establishing a station floating in higher altitudes -about [S4] 50 kilometers above Venus's surface where the [S5] pressures are the same as that of earth-.
Moreover, the author asserts that no existence [S6] of water reservoirs and oxygen makes Venus [S7] an impractical option to live. Additionally, supplying water and oxygen from earth to Venus is an unprofitable [S8] approach as well. On the other hand, the speaker suggests producing water and oxygen by combining chemical compounds that are already on Venus like carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid. So they will not need supplying them from the earth.
Finally, the reading discusses the thicks [S9] clouds of Venus which reflect 60 percent of the sunlight that reaches Venus. Moreover, the carbon dioxide underneath the clouds blocks a great amount of light as well. As a result, producing [S10] electricity or power via solar power is not practical. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that the clouds are not that thick to reflect a high percentage of the light and proposes using that reflected light to make electricity and power for machines and pieces of equipment [S11].
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...es three reasons to support this claim. However.[S2] the speaker casts doubt on each o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sons to support this claim. However.[S2] the speaker casts doubt on each of them....
^^
Line 4, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...machines and pieces of equipment [S11].
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, so, well, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64440294604 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2365588469 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.