Undoubtedly, amphibian illnesses has always been a controversial argument among sientists. More specifically, the writer put forth on some ideas that can help to solve golden frog's fungus problem. However, the professor points out that there are serious flaws whith the writer's claim. To ve exact, the professor believes none of these ideas will not be effective, she more or less, addresses the problem with each point made in the reading.
To begin with, the writer claims that scientists have identified a type of bacterium wich is a natural enemy of the fungus. This bacterium produces a chemical that kills fungal cells. But the professor refutes the the idea and says that although these bacterial kills fungal cells but they are not last very long, she explains colonies of this bacterium produce some chemicals that attacks fungal only on the first moments and then they unable to produce more and become kinda useless.
Secondly, the reading states that breeding golden frogs in disease-free captivty where it is isolated from the fungus, is another solution that reaserchers are considering. The golden frogs bred in captivity will give rise the healthy, fungus-free population. Then agian, the professor stays on the other side of the argument and says that, there other wild animals in habitats where wild golden frogs died out, with the same disease that cause the fungus problem that can infect the frogs and give them fungus.
Finally, Author wraps up the topic by claiming that some frogs have a natural defense against the fungus. When infected, they increase their body temperature, wich slows down the growth of the fungus, and this if this ability spreads among the golden frogs, they can overcome the crisis. The professor, not surprisingly, refutes with this claim and says that, increase in body temprature makes weakens these frogs and they can get ill and die for other causes and they are not strong and healthy eathier.
As we can see, the professor and the writer obviously hold opposing views.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ome ideas that can help to solve golden frogs fungus problem. However, the professor ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...fungal cells. But the professor refutes the the idea and says that although these bacte...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...fungal cells. But the professor refutes the the idea and says that although these bacte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09281437126 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43005528836 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559880239521 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0430261354 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150612222482 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586591635 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607933521213 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772824180827 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764582463367 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.